Hidden Assumption of Gouy-Chapman-Stern Model

27 May 2020, Version 3
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Understanding the double layer at the electrode-electrolyte interface is a long-standing challenge in electrochemistry. The orthodox Gouy-Chapman-Stern (GCS) model and its many derivatives invariably picture the double layer as a serial connection of a compact layer and a diffuse layer. We unravel herein that the serial connection tacitly prescribes a zero potential gradient at the solution-side boundary, which is, rigorously speaking, invalid. The bearing of this problematic assumption is pinpointed by comparing the double-layer impedance, which is analytically solved at the potential of zero charge, derived from the original and amended GCS models. Specifically, in the amended GCS model, the capacitance of the compact layer now shows frequency dispersion. The deviation between the original and amended models is greater when the double layer is confined in narrower space.

Keywords

Electrochemistry
Electrochemical impedance
Gouy-Chapman-Stern model
Double layer

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting information for EDL DC V5
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.