A Hidden Assumption of Gouy-Chapman-Stern Model Fails Under Dynamic Conditions

02 March 2020, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Understanding the double layer at the electrode-electrolyte interface is of fundamental importance to electrochemistry, and also lays the basis for rational design of energy storage and conversion technologies. The prevailing Gouy-Chapman-Stern (GCS) model and its many derivatives invariably picture the double layer as a serial connection of a compact layer and a diffuse layer. We unravel that these models based on the serial connection tacitly prescribe a zero potential gradient at the solution-side boundary. This assumption is generally invalidated under dynamical conditions, resulting in an incorrect expression for the double-layer impedance. Amendment of this deficiency gives out a revised analytical expression for the double-layer impedance at the potential of zero charge with new features. Specifically, the contribution of the compact layer now shows frequency dispersion. The deviation between the original and amended models is greater when the double layer is confined in narrower space. This work changes our basic understanding of double layer model and its impedance response.

Keywords

Electrochemistry
Electrochemical impedance
Gouy-Chapman-Stern model
Double layer

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting material V3
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.