Finding Drug Candidate Hits With a Hundred Samples: Ultra-low Data Screening With Active Learning

18 April 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Active learning (AL) can significantly accelerate drug discovery by iteratively selecting informative molecules, reducing experimental workload. However, existing AL studies typically assume access to large datasets, an unrealistic scenario for most academic labs. Here, we investigate AL strategies tailored specifically for small-scale molecular screening, using only 110 affinity evaluations approximated by docking scores from realistic compound libraries: the Developmental Therapeutics Program repository (DTP) and Enamine Discovery Diversity Set 10 (DDS-10). Among 20 tested combinations of molecular descriptors and machine learning models, we identify Continuous and Data-Driven Descriptors (CDDD) combined with a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), augmented by the Pairwise Difference Regression (PADRE) data augmentation technique, as optimal. This combination achieves a 97% probability of discovering at least five top-1% hits from DTP using only 110 affinity evaluations, even under simulated experimental uncertainty. Similarly, the DDS-10 dataset achieves a 100% probability of discovering at least five top-1% hits from DDS-10 using only 110 affinity evaluations. Incorporating prior knowledge by enriching initial datasets with a single known hit molecule further increases this probability. Our findings underscore the feasibility and substantial potential of AL for small-scale drug discovery in resource-limited environments. Our results suggest that early in the AL search the algorithm benefits from accurately quantifying the binding strengths of very weak binders.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.