The key to reducing steel emissions may be using aluminum instead

13 March 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Steelmaking is a major source of difficult-to-abate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Here, we analyze decarbonization pathways for both aluminum and steel by considering five production routes, including the fossil fuel-based processes that are used today and fully-electrified processes under development. We find that on a $/t CO2 basis, aluminum is cheaper to decarbonize than steel over a wide range of projected electricity costs and carbon intensities. Projections for the year 2050 suggest aluminum abatement costs of $9/t CO2 and steel abatement costs of $363/t CO2 by electrification. Furthermore, we observe that if renewable electricity costs decrease enough for green steel to compete with conventional steel, aluminum may be a cost-effective substitute in many applications. Thus, in contrast to the dominant theory of change, an important option for reducing steel emissions may be substitution with low-carbon aluminum.

Keywords

Aluminum
Steel

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.