Cost-Efficient Evaluation of Molecular Generative Models' Generalizability in de. novo. Drug Design via a Double-Parameter Mathematical Framework

02 January 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Deep generative models are increasingly crucial in de. novo. drug design, excelling in the rapid exploration of vast chemical spaces for advancing molecular design. By integrating techniques such as adversarial networks, reinforcement learning, and transfer learning, these models can effectively leverage both the public datasets and the collected experimental data. However, accurately assessing the generalization ability of these models for drug discovery applications, while minimizing costs, still remains to be challenging. Developing an accurate yet cost-effective solution would provide substantial benefits to both academia and industry. In this study, we propose three accuracy-based methods for predicting the theoretical coverage of generative models, classifying them into three cost levels: low, medium, and high. For all these methods, the derivative of a unique curve with respect to sample iterations can serve as the most cost-effective yet reliable metric for evaluating generalization ability. To address sampling non-uniformity, we propose a novel double-parameter mathematical model that can accurately fit for both experimental and theoretical coverage across various generative architectures. Furthermore, the developed model provides qualitative insights into how transfer learning and reinforcement learning influence generative models' performance by examining changes resulting from increased non-uniformity and enhanced probabilities of sampling target molecules.

Keywords

Transformer learning
reinforcement
cost-effective evaluation
generative models

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Rui Qin: Jan 06, 2025, 02:33

I would like to remind the authors to check the PDF file compiled by LaTeX, as all the formulas in the paper appear to be garbled.