Can SCF and ROKS DFT methods predict inverted singlet-triplet gap?: Benchmarking and rationalization

04 November 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Inverted singlet-triplet gap materials (INVEST) have emerged as an intriguing class of materials with potential applications as emitters in Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). Indeed, this type of material exhibits a negative singlet-triplet energy gap (ΔEST), i.e., an inversion of the lowest singlet (S1) and triplet (T1) excited states, that goes against Hund’s rule. In this study, the ΔEST of a set of 15 INVEST molecules has been computed within the framework of Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) and Delta Self-Consistent Field (ΔSCF) and have benchmarked these results against wavefunction-based methods, such as EOM-CCSD, NEVTP2 and SCS-CC2. We herein demonstrated that ROKS always predicts a positive ΔEST and has been shown to be almost functional-independent. Besides, the ΔSCF usually gives a negative ΔEST, although it is functional-dependent. Our findings indicate that the ΔSCF method together with the PBE0 functional provides the lowest MSD and MAD with respect to EOM-CCSD reference method. However, a very poor Pearson correlation coefficient was computed for all functionals whatever a ROKS or a ΔSCF scheme was employed. We also demonstrated that orbital relaxation and the difference in orbital set in the singlet and the triplet states are the fundamental reasons to ex-plain why ΔSCF is able to predict a negative energy gap. Indeed, we showed that they naturally involve the inclusion of double and higher-order excitations and a difference in spatial localiza-tion of the and spins wavefunctions resulting in spin polarization, namely one of the two reasons for observing a negative ΔEST together with a minimized exchange energy.

Keywords

INVEST
Inverted singlet-triplet gap materials
Organic Light Emitting Diodes
Delta Self-Consistent Field
Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Can SCF and ROKS DFT methods predict inverted singlet-triplet gap?: Benchmarking and rationalization
Description
It includes additional Tables and Figures as well as additional equations rationalizing our results
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.