Abstract
Quantities calculated from molecular simulations are often subject to an initial bias due to unrepresentative starting configurations. Initial data are usually discarded to reduce bias. Chodera's method for automated truncation point selection [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4, 1799–1805] is popular but has not been thoroughly assessed. We reformulate White’s marginal standard error rule to provide a spectrum of truncation point selection heuristics that differ in their treatment of autocorrelation. These include a method effectively equivalent to Chodera's. We test these methods on ensembles of synthetic time series modelled on free energy change estimates from long absolute binding free energy calculations. Methods that more thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show late and variable truncation times, while methods that less thoroughly account for autocorrelation often show early truncation, relative to the optimal truncation point. This increases variance and bias, respectively. We recommend a method that achieves robust performance across our test sets by balancing these two extremes. This, and all other heuristics tested, are implemented in the open-source Python package RED (github.com/fjclark/red).
Supplementary materials
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Supplementary Information for Robust Automated Equilibration Detection for Molecular Simluations.
Actions
Supplementary weblinks
Title
RED GitHub Project Repository
Description
Source code and docs for the RED (Robust Equilibration Detection) Python package.
Actions
View Title
Robust-Equilibration-Detection-Paper Workflow
Description
A complete workflow to reproduce the entire study.
Actions
View Title
Robust-Equilibration-Detection-Paper Data
Description
All data generated during the study (including ABFE gradient data, synthetic datasets, and data from analyses).
Actions
View