Automated Microcontact Bioprinting for High-Throughput Manufacturing of Lubricant-Infused Microarrays

04 October 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Microarrays are widely used for detecting target analytes and biomarkers, with fabrication methods ranging from non-contact to contact bioprinting techniques. Microcontact bioprinting (μCP), which utilizes elastomeric stamps to transfer biorecognition molecules (bioinks) onto substrates, offers advantages such as customizability, cost-effectiveness, and versatility in handling bioinks with high viscosities. Despite its prevalent use in laboratory settings, μCP faces challenges in achieving the repeatability and reproducibility required for industrial manufacturing. In this study, we address these limitations by developing and optimizing a μCP protocol using industrial techniques. A key innovation in our approach is the combination of microcontact printing with fluorosilanization, enabling the use of lubricant-infused surfaces to prevent non-specific attachment. Additionally, we enhance biomolecule immobilization through covalent attachment using a modified bioink formulation. We identify and mitigate high-risk failure modes including bioink formulation, application and removal, environmental conditions, and force application during stamping. Furthermore, we integrate an automated syringe pump and a standardized force application system, taking critical steps toward industrial scalability. Using lubricant-infused substrates, our optimized μCP protocol demonstrates significant improvements in repeatability and reproducibility, achieving intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variance below 10% and signal-to-noise ratios exceeding 15. These advancements validate our μCP method for high-throughput, scalable microarray fabrication, paving the way for its implementation in industrial manufacturing.

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary
Description
Supplementary information, including data and tables, of the manuscript as follows: droplet incubation time graph, brightfield images of aged stamps, fluorescent images of stamp types, lubricant + washing graph, crosslinker assessment graph, EDC, NHS and BSA-FITC quantity/ratio graphs and fluorescent images, separate printing graph, profilometry 3D projection and roughness profiles, GLYMO epoxy additive assessment graph, fluorescent images of glycerol additive concentrations, droplet removal strategy graph and fluorescent images, temperature assessment graph, humidity percentage fluorescent images, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) table, intra-assay and inter-assay %CV tables for EDC/NHS:BSA-FITC ratios, glycerol concentrations, droplet removal strategies, humidity percentages, force application and automation.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.