Individual Marcus-type kinetics controls singlet and triplet oxygen evolution from superoxide

28 August 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Oxygen evolution from superoxide is a critical aspect of oxygen redox chemistry. However, the factors determining the formation of often harmful singlet oxygen are unclear. Here, we report that the release of triplet or singlet oxygen is governed by individual Marcus normal and inverted region behavior. Using a wide range of chemical oxidants, we found that as the driving force increases, the initially dominant evolution of triplet oxygen slows down, and singlet oxygen evolution becomes predominant with higher maximum kinetics. This behavior also applies to superoxide disproportionation, the oxidation of one superoxide by another, in both non-aqueous and aqueous systems, where Lewis and Brønsted acidity control driving forces. Our findings suggest ways to understand and control spin states and kinetics in oxygen redox chemistry.

Keywords

oxygen redox
Marcus theory
singlet oxygen

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs. S1 to S15
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Willem Hendrik Koppenol: Sep 02, 2024, 15:09

Interesting investigation. However, it is very important to explicitly cite the electrode potentials that are being used in the Eh-pH figure. In addition, is O2 dissolved or in the gas phase? Anyway, it would seem that these potentials differ somewhat from the "aqueous" literature we reviewed. See: DOI 10.1515/irm-2013-0005, and DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.04.011.