Abstract
Understanding the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite materials is essential for
industrial use. Particularly, the determination of the polymer modulus at the nanofiller-polymer
interphase is important for optimizing the interfacial mechanical properties. Nanoindentation via
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is well established for measuring the modulus of the interphase
region with nanoscale spatial resolution. However, indentation into heterogeneous materials
presents a confounding issue often referred to as the "substrate effect", i.e., the structural stress
field caused by the rigid body is convoluted with the actual modulus of the interphase region.
While finite element analysis (FEA)-based methods can be used to deconvolute the interphase
modulus from measured apparent modulus-distance profiles, the experimental validation of this
method is still needed. Here, we provide this validation using AFM nanoindentation on a layered
model composite which consists of three layers with different moduli to recapitulate the properties
of the matrix, the filler, and the interphase of real polymer nanocomposites.
By systematically varying the thickness of the “artificial” interphase layer and the AFM probe
radius, we obtain modulus - distance profiles over a wide range of indentation conditions. We
validate a method to deconvolute the substrate effect using an empirically derived master curve
obtained from FEA analysis. Furthermore, we showed that the effect of the artificial interphase on
modulus - distance profiles can be distinguished only if the interphase layer is thick enough
compared to the contact radius of the probe. Finally, we established an innovative and quantitative
framework to predict the interphase thickness from mechanical nanoindentation measurements,
and we discussed the lower, practical limit for interphase thickness determination. In summary,
we provide a broadly applicable method to extract interphase mechanical properties of multiphase
soft materials, and practical guidelines for choosing optimal characterization conditions.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting information
Description
Details of force curve analysis; Dynamic mechanical analysis of photopolymer resins; Details of
phase image analysis; Modulus – distance profile in real spatial dimensions; Effect of different
force setpoint; Complete sensitivity analysis of λpred and E0; Interphase thickness estimation by
reduced distance score
Actions