Holistic prospective life cycle analysis of a proposed copper and nickel mine in Minnesota

16 August 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Decarbonization technologies promise to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, these technologies contain critical minerals, such as nickel, lithium, and cobalt. Minerals mining can have substantial environmental and social impacts. Prospective LCA can be used to project these impacts and compare them among proposed mines, especially in nations like the U.S. that aim to increase domestic minerals production. We therefore conducted a cradle-to-grave LCA on a proposed copper-nickel mine in the United States. Flotation processing was the largest contributor to energy, water, and greenhouse gas burdens. Wastewater treatment and closure also have sizeable energy and water demands. We also estimate that it takes decades or centuries to restore the carbon stock loss from land clearing from reclamation efforts. This analysis highlights the importance of often-neglected elements of a mine’s life cycle in LCA such as land clearing, wastewater treatment, reclamation, and closure.

Keywords

minerals
copper
life cycle assessment

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Contains life cycle inventory data, description of assumptions, comparison against results in the literature
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.