Hyaluronic Acid-based Inks for Stereolithography (Bio)printing: Benefits of Thiol-ene vs. Acrylate Functionalized Inks

13 August 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Hydrogel inks used for 3D bioprinting are mainly based on radical polymerization of methacrylate groups. Inks based on the radical thiol-ene polymerization have raised attention in recent years, as they are not susceptible to oxygen inhibition and require lower light doses for polymerization, therefore, they can be more benign to living cells. Here, we modified hyaluronic acid inks with allyl ether or norbornene groups, which can form a crosslinked network in the presence of a dithiol crosslinker. We performed systematic studies to compare precursor stability, photocrosslinking and printability of the thiol-ene inks with methacrylated hyaluronic acid inks. Our results showed higher storage stability of the thiol-ene hydrogel precursors over 15 months. Photorheology experiments demonstrated faster photocrosslinking and higher temporal control over the network formation in thiol-ene inks. The suitability of thiol-ene inks was demonstrated using digital light processing-based printing with a minimum print time of 2 s per layer and a xy resolution of 100 µm.

Keywords

stereolithography
ink
photocrosslinking
thiol-ene
hydrogel

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.