Abstract
Photoluminescence (PL) intermittency (also known as blinking) is a critical aspect of the optical properties of molecules and nanomaterials. Considerable work has expounded on the mechanism of blinking in nanocrystals, with the canonical model arguing that intermittently trapped charges serve to quench emission via charge-exciton Auger recombination. The dynamics of the emission trace are analyzed by fitting a histogram of on- and off- times to power-law distributions. These histograms in turn, reveal non-exponential kinetics, arguing for a distribution of electron or hole traps. What is not revealed is the origin of these distributed states, whether they arise from various trap energetic depths, long-range electron or hole tunneling, or any other process which gives rise to distributions of rates. We explore a model which invokes both a distribution of trap energies, combined with the chemical intuition of charge transfer via Marcus theory. We find that a self-consistent Marcus theory model can explain different power-law slopes for on- and off- times, and the observed changes in intensity as a function of temperature in films of CdTe nanoplatelets (NPLs). We believe this provides a self-consistent model to describe blinking behavior that leads to unusually low PL quantum yield (QY) in CdTe, and argues that improved passivation will be critical to achieving higher QY.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting information
Description
Supporting information including materials synthesis and charaterization, theoretical time distribution, derivation of energetic relations from Marcus theory, kinetic Monte Carlo method, quantum yield calculation at different temperatures, solution to energetic parameters and blinking statistics under Gaussian distribution of energy.
Actions
Title
Video for blinking nanoplatelets
Description
A video taken in time-resolved photoluminescence measurements, demonstrating blinking of CdTe nanoplatelets.
Actions