Leveraging Asymmetric Catalysis Data for Mechanistic Interrogation of Nickel-Photoredox THF Arylation

09 July 2024, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

This manuscript details the development of an asymmetric variant for the Ni-photoredox α-arylation of tetrahydrofuran (THF), which was originally reported in a racemic fashion by Doyle and Molander. Leveraging the enantioselectivity data that we obtained, a complex mechanistic scenario different from those originally proposed is uncovered. Specifically, an unexpected dependence of the product enantiomeric ratio on both the halide identity (aryl chloride vs. bromide substrates) and the Ni source was observed. Stoichiometric experiments and time course analyses of the evolution of product enantioselectivity with time revealed a different initial behavior for reactions carried out with Ni(II) and Ni(0) pre-catalysts that later converge into a common mechanism. For studying the predominant pathway, this paper describes a rare example of the syntheses of chiral bisoxazoline Ni(II) aryl halide complexes, which proved essential for probing enantioselectivity via stochiometric experiments. These experiments identify the Ni(II) aryl halide complex as the primary species involved in the key THF radical trapping event. A multivariate linear regression model is presented that further validates the dominant mechanism and delineates structure-selectivity relationships between ligand properties and enantioselectivity. EPR analysis of Ni(0)/aryl halide mixtures highlights the fast access to a variety of Ni complexes in 0,+1, and +2 oxidation states that are proposed to be responsible for the initial divergence in mechanism observed when using Ni(0) pre-catalysts. More broadly, beyond advancing the mechanistic understanding of this THF arylation protocol, this work underscores the potential of leveraging enantioselectivity data to unravel intricate mechanistic manifolds within Ni-photoredox catalysis.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.