Density Isobar of Water and Melting Temperature of Ice: Assessing Common Density Functionals

06 June 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

We investigate the density isobars of water and the melting temperature of ice using six different density functionals. Machine-learning potentials are employed to ensure computational affordability. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between various base functionals. Notably, even the choice of damping can result in substantial differences. Overall, the outcomes obtained through density functional theory are not entirely satisfactory across most utilized functionals. All functionals exhibit significant deviations either in the melting temperature or equilibrium volume, with most of them even predicting an incorrect volume difference between ice and water. Our heuristic analysis indicates that a hybrid functional with 25% exact exchange and van der Waals damping averaged between zero and Becke-Johnson dampings yields the closest agreement with experimental data. This study underscores the necessity for further enhancements in the treatment of van der Waals interactions and, more broadly, density functional theory, to enable accurate quantitative predictions for molecular liquids.

Keywords

DFT
water
ice
machine learning potential

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Davide Donadio: Jun 09, 2024, 01:03

We have been "lucky" to pick a good implementation of revPBE0-D3 here. There may even be some error cancellations going our way. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jced.3c00561