A review of methane emissions source types and characteristics, rates, and mitigation across U.S. and Canadian cities

12 March 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

As major sources of methane (CH4) emissions, cities have an important role in mitigating near-term global temperature rise. However, cities are challenging environments for characterizing CH4 emissions due to the diversity and spatial extent of sources. Furthermore, the characteristics and contributions of different sources are poorly understood due to a lack of synthesis and integration of the literature, with knock-on implications for policies and mitigation. Here, we review peer-reviewed journal articles on CH4 emissions from cities in the U.S. and Canada to consolidate the current state of knowledge and highlight key research priorities. From 32 of 94 studies reviewed, we find that estimates of total city-level CH4 emissions derived from top-down measurements are on average 5.6 (± 7.8) times larger than bottom-up inventory estimates. Emissions from natural gas distribution and end use, and landfills, dominate city-level CH4 footprints. The average urban natural gas loss rate of 1.8% ± 0.9% from 12 studies increases the overall natural gas supply chain loss rate estimate to 4.0% ± 0.9%. Top-down estimates of CH4 emissions from landfills were on average 10.6 times greater than Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program estimates. Landfill studies indicate that better accounting of spatial and temporal phenomena such as fugitives, hotspots, and variations in weather and soil conditions is central to improving emissions rate estimates. A handful of studies examined mitigation and highlighted the role of measurement to identify specific mitigation opportunities and verify CH4 emissions reductions. The review findings raise questions and highlight challenges around existing bottom-up inventory approaches, urban natural gas loss rates and slip, landfill emissions estimation techniques, and mitigation effectiveness. The review concludes with recommendations on research priorities to address key knowledge gaps: (i) new source-level measurement datasets and modeling approaches for bottom-up emissions estimation, (ii) more granular investigations to understand the specific sources and causes of CH4 emissions from urban natural gas infrastructure and end use, (iii) a better coupling between measurement and modeling of landfill CH4 emissions, and (iv) mitigation-focused studies.

Keywords

methane emissions
cities
urban
natural gas
waste
emissions rates
mitigation

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information for "A review of methane emissions source types and characteristics, rates, and mitigation across U.S. and Canadian cities" by Vollrath et al.
Description
Additional details on figure development, reference list of all articles reviewed, and summaries of evidence from each of the articles.
Actions
Title
Supplementary Data for "A review of methane emissions source types and characteristics, rates, and mitigation across U.S. and Canadian cities" by Vollrath et al.
Description
Parameters extracted from the articles and additional sheets on the emissions rates extracted from select articles.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.