Tuning sorbent properties to reduce the cost of direct air capture

08 March 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The question has shifted from whether solid sorbents can work in direct air capture (DAC) technologies to which solid sorbents are more economically advantaged. Determining this is challenging due to the influence of many different yet interconnected sorbent properties on the cost of CO2 capture. Existing DAC economic models oversimplify sorbent stability by treating it as a simple replacement rate, neglecting crucial factors such as capacity loss rate and form. To address this challenge, we have developed an economic model that accounts for sorbent degradation in DAC processes. By factoring in capacity loss over time, our model provides a more accurate estimate of the cost associated with DAC and highlights the optimum time for sorbent replacement. We then identified sorbent characteristics and process features that minimize both the carbon footprint and the cost of captured CO2. To further investigate the interplay of sorbent properties and DAC cost, we constructed a series of alkyl- and epoxy-functionalized polyamine sorbents. The sorbents’ CO2 uptake, heat of adsorption and capacity fade were adjusted via a one-step modification, varying the proportions of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines. We then integrated the experimentally-measured parameters, including the form of degradation, into our economic model to probe which combination of sorbent properties results in the lowest cost of DAC for a fixed operating condition. The results provide guidelines and priorities for sorbent performance metrics that will yield the most cost-effective DAC technologies.

Keywords

direct air capture
carbon capture
adsorption
adsorbent design
techno-economic analysis
degradation
amine
poly(ethyleneimine)

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Contains input variables for economic model, supplemental figures, detailed economic model methods, example results of DAC LCOC, comparison to other economic models in literature, detailed experimental methods, and supplemental references
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.