Conical Intersection Accessibility Dictates Brightness in Red Fluorescent Proteins

07 November 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Red fluorescent protein (RFP) variants are highly sought after for in-vivo imaging since longer wavelengths improve depth and contrast in fluorescence imaging. However, the lower energy emission wavelength usually correlates with a lower fluorescent quantum yield than their green emitting counterparts. To guide the rational design of bright variants, we have theoretically assessed two variants (mScarlet and mRouge) which are reported to have very different brightness. Using an α-CASSCF QM/MM framework (chromophore and all protein residues within 6 Å of it in the QM region, for a total of more than 450 QM atoms), we identify key points on the ground and first excited state potential energy surfaces. The brighter variant mScarlet has a rigid scaffold, and the chromophore stays largely planar on the ground state. The dimmer variant mRouge shows more flexibility and can accommodate a pre-twisted chromophore conformation which provides easier access to conical intersections. The main difference between the variants lies in the intersection seam regions, which appear largely inaccessible in mScarlet but partially accessible in mRouge. This observation is mainly related with changes in the cavity charge distribution, the hydrogen-bonding network involving the chromophore and a key ARG/THR mutation (which changes both charge and steric hindrance).

Keywords

red fluorescent proteins
fluorescence
CASSCF
conical intersection
photochemistry

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Supplementary Information for Conical Intersection Accessibility Dictates Brightness in Red Fluorescent Proteins
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.