Abstract
Conformer generation, the assignment of realistic 3D coordinates to a small molecule, is fundamental to structure based drug design. Conformational ensembles are required for rigid-body matching algorithms, such as shape-based or pharmacophore approaches, and even methods that treat the ligand flexibly, such as docking, are dependent on the quality of the provided conformations due to not sampling all degrees of freedom (e.g. only sampling torsions). Our goal here is not to comprehensively evaluate the expansive suite of available conformer generation tools, but to empirically elucidate some general principles about the size, diversity and quality of conformational ensembles needed to get the best performance in common structure-based drug discovery tasks. In many cases our findings may parallel ``common knowledge'' well-known to practitioners of the field. Nonetheless, we feel it is valuable to quantify these conformational effects while reproducing and expanding upon previous studies. Specifically, we investigate the performance of a state-of-the-art generative deep learning approach versus a more classical geometry based approach, the effect of energy minimization as a post-processing step, the effect of ensemble size (maximum number of conformers), and construction (filtering by RMSD for diversity) and how these choices influence the ability to recapitulate bioactive conformations and perform pharmacophore screening and molecular docking.
Supplementary weblinks
Title
Supporting code
Description
Instructions and code for replicating all the analyses discussed in the document.
Actions
View