Accelerating Alchemical Free Energy Prediction Using a Multistate Method: Application to Multiple Kinases
Comments
I had a question about differences in performance between OpenFF and GAFF. In the conclusions it says that PIM1 is a (one of the?) case(s) where OpenFF performance was not better than GAFF, but I'm wondering what statistic you have in mind when you say that? Table 3 seems to indicate otherwise. Or did you mean PAK, where Table 1 has GAFF doing better as judged by MUE, but OpenFF doing better on tau and rho? Or maybe I'm just missing what data you're looking at.
Response,
Candide Champion
: Aug 10, 2023, 11:01
Dear David Mobley. Thank you for your comment. We based our discussion on the MUE values for the PIM dataset (Table 3), which are slightly larger for OpenFF (4.9 kJ/mol) compared to GAFF (4.6 kJ/mol). However, as you point out, the correlation metrics indicate otherwise. Importantly, the correlation metrics (Spearman Rho and Kendall Tau) are consistently better with OpenFF across all three datasets. We will update our manuscript accordingly.