Why Deep Models Often Cannot Beat Non-deep Counterparts on Molecular Property Prediction?

03 July 2023, Version 3
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Molecular property prediction (MPP) is a crucial task in the drug discovery pipeline, which has recently gained considerable attention thanks to advances in deep neural networks. However, recent research has revealed that deep models struggle to beat traditional non-deep ones on MPP. In this study, we benchmark 12 representative models (3 non-deep models and 9 deep models) on 14 molecule datasets. Through the most comprehensive study to date, we make the following key observations: \textbf{(\romannumeral 1)} Deep models are generally unable to outperform non-deep ones; \textbf{(\romannumeral 2)} The failure of deep models on MPP cannot be solely attributed to the small size of molecular datasets. What matters is the irregular molecule data pattern; \textbf{(\romannumeral 3)} In particular, tree models using molecular fingerprints as inputs tend to perform better than other competitors. Furthermore, we conduct extensive empirical investigations into the unique patterns of molecule data and inductive biases of various models underlying these phenomena.

Keywords

Molecular Property Predcition
Deep Neural Networks
Graph Neural Networks
Transformer
Drug Discovery

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 2, Jun Xia: Aug 06, 2023, 09:10

The primary version has been accepted at ICML2023 Computational Workshop (Spotlight Talk) and IMLH Workshop (Averaged score: 9.0)

Comment number 1, Jun Xia: Jul 03, 2023, 11:48

The primary version has been accepted at ICML2023 IMLH Workshop.