Abstract
DFT calculations with the well-tested OLYP and B3LYP* exchange-correlation functionals (along with D3 dispersion corrections and all-electron ZORA STO-TZ2P basis sets) and careful use of group theory have led to significant insights into the question of metal- versus ligand-centered redox in Co and Ni B,C-tetradehydrocorrin complexes. For the cationic complexes, both metals occur in their low-spin M(II) forms. In contrast, the charge-neutral states vary for the two metals: while the Co(I) and CoII-TDCdot2minus state are comparable in energy for cobalt, a low-spin NiII-TDCdot2minus state is clearly preferred for nickel. The latter behavior stands in sharp contrast to other corrinoids that reportedly stabilize a Ni(I) center.
Supplementary materials
Title
Optimized Cartesian coordinates
Description
Optimized Cartesian coordinates
Actions