Mechanical origins of lithium-metal intrusions into garnet solid electrolytes revealed by failure statistics

20 June 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Solid-state electrolytes are an attractive option to increase the chemical stability and energy density of rechargeable lithium-metal batteries. However, they are susceptible to lithium-metal short-circuiting during charging, especially under high current densities. In this work, using a force-controlled electrical microprobe inside a focused-ion beam scanning electron microscope, we performed 48 experiments of electroplating lithium metal onto Li6.6La3 Ta0.4Zr1.6O12 (LLZO) and observed the initiation of lithium penetration (termed intrusions) into the solid electrolyte, with and without externally applied stress. Employing a statistical approach, we find that the cumulative probability of intrusion as a function of lithium metal diameter follows a two-parameter Weibull distribution, implying defect-governed fracture behavior for the intrusion initiation. Upon applying a contact force of 5 mN with a 5-10 µm microprobe, the characteristic failure diameter of lithium metal decreases by a factor of 2.6 due to the generation of nanoscale cracks as suggested by nanoindentation and finite element simulations. Furthermore, we introduce in-plane compressive strain to LLZO through a cantilever bending experiment and demonstrate that strain as small as 0.067% strongly influences the direction of intrusion propagation immediately following initiation. Overall, our results suggest that both mechanically-generated and pre-existing defects as well as mechanical strain dominate the intrusion behavior in LLZO, a phenomenon that could extend to other solid electrolytes.

Keywords

LLZO
solid state battery
lithium-metal intrusion
solid electrolytes
failure statistics
operando SEM
microprobe
microcracks
mechanical strain

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.