Origin of The Failure of Density Functional Theories in Predicting Inverted Singlet-Triplet Gaps

09 July 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Recent experimental and theoretical studies have shown several new organic molecules that violate Hund’s rule and have the first singlet excited state lower in energy than the first triplet excited state. While many correlated single reference wave function methods have successfully predicted excited state energetics of these low-lying states, linear-response time-dependent density functional theory (LR-TDDFT) fails to predict the correct excited state energy ordering. Herein, we have shown that it is possible to get inverted singlet-triplet gaps within the density functional theory framework by going beyond the singly excited state framework of conventional LR-TDDFT. Going beyond Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT), we have demonstrated that a combined wave function and density functional method resulting in amulticonfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), in some cases, can predict inverted singlet-triplet gaps. Consequently, we have identified that both the missing doubly excited configurations and the form of the exchange-correlation functionals are the foremost grounds for the failure of the LR-TDDFT method. We have also compared the accuracy of single reference correlated wave function methods for these low-lying singlet and triplet excited states to multireference second-order perturbation theory.

Keywords

Density functional theory
Inverted singlet-triplet gaps
Multiconfiguration pair-denisty functional theory
Organic light emitting diode
Time-dependent density functional theory
Wave function methods

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information for "Origin of The Failure of Density Functional Theories in Predicting Inverted Singlet-Triplet Gaps"
Description
Full computational details, coordinates of the optimized structures.
Actions
Title
Table of content
Description
Table of content
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.