“Direct”, “Inverted” and “Superdirect” Sigma Bonds: Substituent Angles and Bond Energy. The Case of the CC Bonds in Hydrocarbons.

19 October 2020, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The A-A dissociation energy with respect to geometry frozen fragments (BE) of has been calculated for AHn-AHn models (C2H6, Si2H6, Ge2H6 and N2H4) as a function of  = H-A-A angles. Following a sigmoidal variation, BE decreases rapidly when  decreases to yield “inverted bonds” for  < 90° and finally nearly vanishes. On the contrary BE increases when  increases with respect to the equilibrium value; we propose the term of “superdirect” to qualify such bonds. This behaviour has been qualitatively interpreted in the case of C2H6 by the variation of the overlap of both s+p hybrids. The BE of one C-H bond in CH3 behaves similarly as function of its H-C-H angle with the other three hydrogen atoms. The concept of inverted/direct/superdirect bond is generalized to any CC sigma bond in hydrocarbons and can be characterized by the mean angle value <> of this bond with substituents (multiple-bonded substituents are considered as several substituents). This applies as well to formal single bonds as to sigma bonds in a formally multiple bond.

Keywords

DFT
Chemical bonding
Molecular Orbitals
Inverted bond
Superdirect bond

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.