Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of materials that has shown great potential
in catalysis, sensing, separations, and carbon capture and storage. Conventionally, MOFs are synthesized
at lab-scale using organic solvent-based systems, leading to high environmental burdens and high operating
costs, which ultimately hinders the large-scale production and application of MOFs. Aqueous synthesis of
MOFs overcomes such difficulty by eliminating the organic solvent, which makes it an environmentalfriendlier and economically-favorable alternative to the current production method. However, further quantitative analysis is required to compare the environmental and economic performances of the two
methods. Here, we used life cycle assessment (LCA) coupled with techno-economic analysis (TEA) to
evaluate the environmental and economic performances of different UiO-66-NH2 production methods.
When the solvothermal method was replaced by the aqueous solution-based method, the LCA and TEA
results suggest the environmental burdens and cost of UiO-66-NH2 production were reduced by up to 91%
and 84%, respectively. By using aqueous solution-based method, the cradle to gate carbon footprint and
production cost of UiO-66-NH2 were estimated to be 43 kg CO2 eq/kg and $15.8/kg, respectively. We
further applied our LCA results to reassess the role of UiO-66-NH2 in carbon capture and storage (CCS)
and compare its environmental performance with current benchmark (amine-based solvent). Our results
show that UiO-66-NH2 could potentially have better environmental performance than the amine-based
solvent if the number of regeneration cycles is greater than 1513. This work is the first comprehensive
LCA-TEA study that quantifies the substantial environmental and economic benefits of using the aqueous
solution-based systems to produce UiO-66-NH2, and the analysis in this work is intended to be a starting
point for further systematic studies on the full life-cycle impacts of MOFs.