LC-MS/MS Validation for Drug of Abuse Testing Utilizing a Split Sample Oral Fluid Collection System.

06 October 2020, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) recently authorized oral fluid (OF) as a preferable biofluid for drugs of abuse (DOA) screening compared to urine, and they required that each screening method be confirmed by a laboratory test. We developed a DOA mass spectrometry (MS) assay optimized for undiluted OF as a matching confirmatory test for the EZ-Saliva point of care (POC), split sample, rapid visual test. Using a double isotope ratio standardization, we achieved a limit of detection of <0.3 ng/mL for seven DOAs, with high precision in undiluted patient OF (CV<7.2%), linearity of R2 = 0.99, lack of interference (<1.0%) by a panel of interfering compounds at 1000-fold excess, and a dynamic range of 0-850 ng/mL, from a consented population of N=84 self-reported THC users using the collection device (device yield >90%). Stability from degradation exceeded 72 hours. The lateral flow immunoassay strips of the POC exhibited a dose-dependent response, with a 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for N=22 self-reported, THC patient OF, digitized for quantitation. We conclude that the split sample POC device in combination with the MS assay meets the SAMHSA stated requirements for a POC test with a laboratory confirmation. Split sample collection has significant advantages because it minimizes potential error created by taking a separate OF sample for laboratory confirmation. We recommend scaling to a larger validation study set and quantification of user OF THC levels that correlate with driver impairment levels.

Keywords

oral fluid
drugs of abuse
mass spectrometry
point of care testing
split sample

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplemental Table 3
Description
Actions
Title
Supplemental Table 2
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.