Abstract
One of the main drawbacks in the density functional theory (DFT)
formalism is the underestimation of the energy gaps in semiconducting materials.
The combination of DFT with an explicit treatment of electronic correlation
with a Hubbard-like model, known as DFT+U method, has been extensively
applied to open up the energy gap in materials. Here, we introduce a systematic
study where the selection of U parameter is analyzed considering two different
basis sets: plane-waves (PWs) and numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs), together
with different implementations for including U, to investigate the structural and electronic properties of a well-defined
bipyramidal (TiO2)35 nanoparticle (NP). This study
reveals, as expected, that a certain U
value can reproduce the experimental value for the energy gap. However, there
is a high dependence on the choice of basis set and, and on the +U parameter
employed. The present study shows that the linear combination of the NAO basis
functions, as implemented in FHI-aims, requires a lower U value than the
simplified rotationally invariant approaches as implemented in VASP. Therefore,
the transferability of U values between codes is unfeasible and not
recommended, demanding initial benchmark studies for the property of interest as
a reference to determine the appropriate value of U.