The Limited Predictive Power of the Pauling Rules

04 December 2019, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Pauling rules have been used for decades to rationalise the crystal structures of ionic compounds. Despite their importance, there has been so far no statistical assessment of the performances of these five empirical rules. Here, we test rigorously and automatically all five Pauling rules for a large data set of around 5000 known oxides. We discuss each Pauling rule separately stressing their limits and range of application in terms of chemistries and structures. We conclude that only 13% of the oxides simultaneously satisfy the last four rules, indicating their much lower predictive power than expected.

Keywords

Solid-state structures
Oxides
Pauling Rules

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information 27 11 19
Description
Actions
Title
CSV Files Supporting Info 27 11 19
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.